American White Supremacism

An uncomfortable history lesson.

On July 4th, 1776 the famous American Declaration of Independence was signed. It states, amongst other things:

 “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” That, to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That, whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.[1]

This paragraph is relatively brief, but it explains so much of the modern day ‘schizo’ character of the United States. Firstly, 41 of the 56 signatories to the Declaration of Independence owned slaves at the time of signing.[2]

Just think about that for a moment, that 41 people in high office could put their name to a document stating ‘all men are created equal’ whilst at the same time owning human beings as chattel and complaining about “merciless Indian savages” a little later on in the text.

But it’s really the second highlighted passage that I want to draw to your attention, because when the Founding Fathers said:

“[W]henever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it” – they were basically enshrining the ‘right’ of Americans to violently overthrow their government, if they felt it wasn’t delivering enough ‘life, liberty and pursuit of happiness’.

And that probably explains a lot about why the United States has a huge problem with White Supremacist movements who are looking for ways to overthrow the government: history is repeating itself.

American white supremacism

Like all good patriots, Americans like to believe the best about the country they call home.

That’s natural, it’s human nature. But, when you really lift the cover and take a peek at the violent history of what came to be known as the United States of America, it explains so much of why today, the country is standing on a very dangerous precipice.

The official history always painted the white settlers as the ‘good guys’ who were fending off attacks from bloodthirsty redskins. But there was another side of that story that got airbrushed out of history, namely how millions of indigenous people were murdered in cold blood to make it easier for the Europeans to take their land.

No-one was around to document the violence and murder at the beginning of this process, or to know the scale of what was really going on. But by the mid-1800s, there was enough information circulating for modern historians to have a much clearer view of what was occurring in what became the modern State of California.

Historian Benjamin Madley wrote a book in 2016 called “An American Genocide”.

The book sets out some highly disturbing facts about what occurred in the State of California then, that are rarely taught in American schools, including:

  • 120,000 California Indians met the deaths between 1846 and 1873;
  • A very large proportion of these Indians, including women and children, were brutally murdered by white settlers enticed to California by the goldrush.
  • The American press and most American politicians lauded these murderers (many of whom perpetrated their atrocities wearing the uniform of the American army.) Instead of deriding these wholesale massacres of whole communities as atrocities, they referred to them as ‘battles’, even when they were carried out by vigilantes, and even when the Indians being murdered had not acted with any prior aggression.
  • The US government tacitly and openly encouraged these murders. In 1851, the first California Governor Peter Burnett said in his Governor’s message:

“[A] war of extermination will continue to be waged between the races, until the Indian race becomes extinct.”

  • The State of California started paying high wages to people who would volunteer to participate in ‘anti-Indian’ militias, full expecting the Federal government to reimburse the cost. The US government paid vigilantes money for every Indian scalp, or severed head they presented them with. Many Indians were also deliberately poisoned by food laced with strychnine.
  • The Native people in California were denied the most basic rights by the courts. White people who killed them, enslaved them, stole from them, kidnapped them would not be arrested or imprisoned for their crimes against Indians, because the courts refused to accept any testimony from Indians.

By the end of the 19th century, the few Indians who had survived the massacres understood that moving to a reservation and giving up their rights to their own land was really the only workable option on the table, if they didn’t want to be totally and completed annihilated by the white settlers.

No-one knows how many Indians were killed between 1600 and 1900.

The matter is still being hotly debated. On the low end, historians say there were two million natives in what is now the USA before Europe conquered America, on the high end, that there were 18 million[3].

But what is not in dispute is that by 1900, only 250,000[4] native Americans remained in the whole of the USA, while the rest of the population in the 1890 Census had grown to 63 million.[5]

THE TAKE HOME FROM THIS SECTION:

White settlers from Europe brutally disposed of the native inhabitants of the continental USA, because they wanted exclusive ownership of their land.

American white supremacism

“MANIFEST DESTINY”

In 1845, just prior to the genocide of America’s West Coast natives, an American journalist named John O’Sullivan coined the phrase ‘Manifest Destiny’ to explain the widely-held belief that America and its white, Protestant population were the new ‘chosen people’, and that God had “destined” America to “expand its dominion and spread democracy and capitalism across the entire North American continent.”[6]

But only for whites.

Nearly all of America’s early economic success was built on the back of non-white slave labor. Some historians estimate that between 6-7 million black slaves were shipped to North America from Africa during the 18th century alone. To give some contrast, the official census figures for that same period of time (white only) show that the white population in the US grew from 250,000 in the year 1700, to 5.3 million people by the year 1800.[7] Most of these slaves were literally worked to death.

Officially, the US Congress outlawed the slave trade in 1808, but still permitted domestic trade in slaves, not least because the tobacco and then cotton-based economy of the Southern states was totally dependent on slave labor to continue to run.

This 5 minute video will tell you more about Manifest Destiny:

———————————————-

How ‘Manifest Destiny contributed to the American Civil War

By 1840, the US population stood at around 17 million, and it was at this point that a decision was made at the political level to pursue ‘manifest destiny’ and expand West-ward. When gold was discovered in California in 1848, this accelerated the pace of settlement, and brought ever more rapacious, greedy and brutal prospectors out to the US looking for gold.

With the increase in the size of the continental US, and the murder of millions of Indians who previously had been used by the Spanish on the West Coast as slave laborers, the US ran into a problem:

There was no way these massive additional tracts of land could be farmed properly, without expanding the US slave trade.

The abolitionist movement had started to pick up steam in the Northern states, who were economically far less dependent on slave labor, but even there, it wasn’t only human rights considerations that were in play. This from history.com:

“While many abolitionists based their activism on the belief that slaveholding was a sin, others were more inclined to the non-religious “free-labor” argument, which held that slaveholding was regressive, inefficient and made little economic sense.”

For many abolitionists, it boiled down to an economic argument, rather than moral one. So on the one hand, there were a number of states who were reliant on slavery for their economic growth, and who wanted to continue and expand it, and on the other, there were a number of states who felt that slavery was economically inefficient, and also (incidentally….) not a very nice thing to do.

That set the stage for America’s civil war, which the Unionists managed to win not least because 186,000 former black slaves from the secessionist South joined the ranks of the Union army – accounting for 10% of its forces.[8]

Slavery was ‘officially’ abolished in the US in 1863, but the ‘white supremacist’ and ‘manifest destiny’ attitudes that underpinned slavery, genocide, and the ruthless economic exploitation of non-whites would continue to flourish in America in many other ways.

And now, we start to bring this story into the modern era.

TAKEAWAY FROM THIS SECTION:

The American economy was built off the back of slave labor. From the middle of the 19th century on, white Americans also came to see themselves as a new ‘chosen people’ who’d been chosen by God to conquer the whole of the continental USA – and beyond.

American white supremacism

SOCIAL DARWINISM AND WHITE SUPREMACISTS

Around the same time that Abraham Lincoln was formally abolishing slavery in the US, in the UK a rich industrialist with scientific ambitions was trying to put together a ‘theory’ to explain why only certain ‘races’ of men deserved the vote, and why it was OK that the rich people at the top of the pyramid continued to exploit and enslave the poorer people underneath them.

This theory came to be known colloquially as ‘survival of the fittest’, and despite the great paucity of any real ‘science’ to back it up, it was swiftly adopted by the great thinkers of the time, as an easy ‘get out’ clause for their consciences.

The pseudo-science behind the “survival of the fittest” arbitrarily divided humanity up into ‘races’, and suggested that the more aggressive and greedier peoples who were exploiting everyone else were ‘the fittest’ specimens that were being naturally selected. Of course, that fit the colonial mindset very nicely, and it made ‘racism’ a virtue.

From the close of the 19th century onwards, Western science strove mightily towards this ideal of creating and perfecting the ‘fittest’ race.

Darwin’s theory led to the creation of the pseudo-science of eugenics, and had white supremacists all over the world preening themselves about their ‘superlative’ gene pool, which they felt entitled them to much greater shares of the world’s wealth and resources than the ‘inferior’ races they were displacing, exploiting and killing.

In a nutshell, Darwin’s ‘theory of evolution’ and ‘natural selection’ bunkum told the European white people who were exploiting everyone else exactly what they wanted to hear: carry on doing what you’re doing, it’s the natural way for the ‘strong’ to oppress and kill the weak, and for the ‘fittest’ to grab the food out of the ‘unfittest’s’ mouth….

For a nation that already believed it was the new chosen people, and that it had a mandate, or ‘manifest destiny’ from God to rule the world, this was music to the ears.

TAKEAWAY FROM THIS SECTION:

‘Natural selection’ and the theory of evolution was invented to give wealthy, white Europeans with a pseudo-scientific excuse for why it was ok to go around killing and exploiting brown and black people, and stealing their land and natural resources.

American white supremacism

AMERICAN EUGENICS

So now we’ve set the scene a little bit more, let’s skip forward to 1916, where a blue-blooded American lawyer called Madison Grant had just published a book called:

THE PASSING OF THE GREAT RACE

Grant was part of an elite set that included the crème of American society, including many wealthy elites, intellectuals, academics, politicians and presidents. At the beginning of the 20th century, this group of well-connected people in America started to feel increasingly upset about the number of non-white ‘inferior’ races that were crowding America’s shores.

In 1916, when the book was published, America’s population stood at a touch under 102 million[9]. Already at this stage, Grant and his group in America started sounding alarms that the proud ‘Nordic Races’ who had founded America were committing what he termed ‘race suicide’ by letting in so many ‘inferior’ races – and Jews were top of the list.

Grant wrote:

“The man of the old stock is being driven off the streets of New York City by the swarms of Polish Jews.”

He continued:

These immigrants adopt the language of the native American, they wear his clothes, they steal his name, and they are beginning to take his women, but they seldom adopt his religion or understand his ideals and while he is being elbowed out of his own home the American looks calmly abroad and urges on others the suicidal ethics which are exterminating his own race.”

In another passage, he wrote:

The cross between a white man and an Indian is an Indian; the cross between a white man and a Negro is a Negro; the cross between a white man and a Hindu is a Hindu; and the cross between any of the three European races and a Jew is a Jew.

Grant was a big fan of eugenics and euthanasia.

In that same book, he wrote:

“Mistaken regard for what are believed to be divine laws and a sentimental belief in the sanctity of human life tend to prevent both the elimination of defective infants and the sterilization of such adults as are themselves of no value to the community. The laws of nature require the obliteration of the unfit, and human life is valuable only when it is of use to the community or race.

(Today, when the State of New York has passed a law enabling parents to murder their newborns right up to the moment of actual birth, it’s becoming clearer and clearer how this awful lack of morality was inspired and encouraged by Darwinian pseudo-science and its associated ‘ethics’.)

Grant concluded:

We Americans must realize that the altruistic ideals which have controlled our social development during the past century and the maudlin sentimentalism that has made America “an asylum for the oppressed,” are sweeping the nation toward a racial abyss. If the Melting Pot is allowed to boil without control and we continue to follow our national motto and deliberately blind ourselves to all “distinctions of race, creed or color,” the type of native American of Colonial descent will become as extinct as the Athenian of the age of Pericles, and the Viking of the days of Rollo.

American white supremacism

Grant’s message fell on very receptive ears – both in the USA itself, which went on to pass laws severely curtailing immigration to the USA in the 1920s – and also in Germany, where one A. Hitler wrote to tell Grant how much he’d enjoyed his book.

Lothrop Stoddard was one of Grant’s acolytes, who was inspired to write his own book warning white Americans against the dangerous ‘colored tide’ about to flood in. In 1921, President Warren Harding (Republican) told a crowd of 10,000 people in Alabama:

“Whoever will take the time to read Mr Lothrop Stoddard’s book The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy…must realise that our race problem here in the United States is only a phase of the race problem that the whole world confronts….if we mean the things we say about democracy as the ideal political state.” In that same speech, Harding stated: “Racial amalgamation there cannot be.”[10]

The next president of the United States, Calvin Coolidge, (Republican) was even more unabashedly ‘pro’ white supremacy. Writing in Good Housekeeping in 1921, he said:

“America has…been an asylum for those who have been driven from their homes in foreign countries because of various forms of political and religious oppression….It is a duty our country owes itself to require of all those aliens who come here that they have a background not inconsistent with American institutions. Such a background might consist either of a racial background or a national experience. But in its lowest terms it must be characterized by a capacity for assimilation.”

Coolidge continued:

“[I]t would be suicidal for us to let down the bars for the inflowing of cheap manhood.”[11]

(In case you’re worrying that racism and white supremacy was only a Republican party problem, this is probably a good time to tell you that the Ku Klux Klan was started in Southern America by Democrats seeking to limit Republican political power in the South after the civil war, as so many blacks were voting for the party who’d emancipated them.)[12]

TAKEAWAY FROM THIS SECTION:

America at the turn of the 20th century introduced a number of very restrictive immigration laws, to make it as hard as possible for ‘inferior’ races to enter America and amalgamate with the ‘superior’ white stock. White superiority and a ‘race’ problem were freely and openly talked about by presidents, politicians, lawyers, judges and the cream of American society.

American white supremacism

AMERICAN NAZIS

As we mentioned, Hitler was highly impressed by all this incredibly racist, pseudo-scientific, eugenicist talk coming out of America, much of which went on to actually shape American immigration policy and suffrage.

In 2017, Yale Law Professor James Q. Whitman wrote a book called: Hitler’s American Model: The United States and the Making of Nazi Race Law. In THIS article, Whitman explains his main thesis, and tells us something incredible about a meeting that was held in 1934 by the Reich’s top lawyers, to plan the Nuremburg Laws that would decide ‘who was a Jew’:

“Throughout the early 1930s, the years of the making of the Nuremberg Laws, Nazi policymakers looked to US law for inspiration. Hitler himself, in Mein Kampf (1925), described the US as ‘the one state’ that had made progress toward the creation of a healthy racist society, and after the Nazis seized power in 1933 they continued to cite and ponder US models regularly.”

Whitman continues:

“Throughout the meeting the most ardent supporters of the US model were the most radical Nazis in the room.”

All this should give massive pause for thought as to what the US really stood for then, and continues to stand for today.

But there’s more. Recently, new footage came to light that shows 20,000 American Nazis gathered together in Madison Square Garden in 1939, a few short months before World War II broke out.

You can watch it HERE – and I highly recommend that you do. And then take a breath, and remember that this took place not in Berlin, but in New York City, in 1939. Here’s some of what the leading American Nazi, Fritz Kuhn, had to say in his speech to the audience on that night:

“We, with American ideals, demand that our government shall be returned to the American people who founded it. If you ask me what we are fighting for under our charter, first: a socially-just, white, gentile-ruled United States. Gentile-controlled labor unions, free from Jewish, Moscow-directed domination.”

That night in Madison Square Garden, Kuhn appeared under a massive 8 metre tall picture of George Washington, who Kuhn liked to call: “America’s first fascist”.

American white supremacism

WHY DIDN’T AMERICA SIDE WITH NAZI GERMANY?

Given the institutionalized racism in America, given the prominent, reverent place accorded to ‘white supremacy’ and ‘manifest destiny’, it’s clear that it wasn’t an automatic choice for the USA to oppose the Germans. Close to 25% of the American population in the 1930s were either German immigrants themselves, or the first generation children of German immigrants to the US[13].

Even after World War II began, there were still Nazi ‘summer camps’ for children – organized along the same lines as the Hitler Youth – operating across many States in America.[14] These were only closed when America actually joined the war in December 1941, after the bombing of Pearl Harbor.

In the run-up to World War II, there was a sizeable contingent of Americans who shared many of the same views and opinions as the Nazis in Germany.

These views were based on Darwin-inspired eugenics and other horrific theories of ‘race suicide’ (which today has morphed into the term ‘white genocide’, amongst modern white supremacists). These people wanted America to stay out of the war in Europe, and to let Hitler get on with the job of ‘cleansing’ the continent.

Photo by Harris & Ewing

One of the most vocal groups at this time was called the ‘America First Committee’, which had Charles Lindbergh, one of early America’s biggest celebrities, at its head. Lindbergh became famous in 1927 for making the first successful solo flight across the Atlantic, and he was adored by large swathes of the American public.

With his backing, America First quickly swelled to 800,000 members. In May 1940, a week after Nazi Germany had invaded Belgium, the Netherlands and France, an opinion poll was taken in America to see who was in favor of the US entering the war. The results:

“showed that Americans overwhelmingly opposed entering World War II.”[15]

According to Lindbergh and the millions of people in the US who shared his outlook and beliefs, the only people who wanted America to enter the War was the Jews. On September 11th, 1941, Lindbergh denounced American Jews as being ‘war agitators’ in a speech he gave at Des Moines Iowa.

Three months later, in December 1941, America entered World War II, and that’s when ‘America First’ was officially disbanded. But ingrained dislike of Jews, and the racist attitudes about saving the (white, Protestant) American people from ‘race suicide’ continued throughout the war – and beyond.

TAKEAWAY FROM THIS SECTION:

American laws and racist policies inspired the Nazis, when they formulated the Nuremberg Laws to dehumanize the Jewish population, before World War II. Much of the American population shared the Nazis views on race and white superiority, which may partially explain why it took America two years to enter the war on the side of the Allies.

American white supremacism

WHY DIDN’T AMERICA DO MORE TO SAVE EUROPE’S JEWS?

There is currently an exhibit being shown at the United States Holocaust Memoriam Museum called: Americans and the Holocaust which encapsulates the problem facing America today, because there is currently a tug-of-war between historians about whether Franklin Delano Roosevelt was an anti-semite who deliberately minimized the number of Jews reaching American shores, or whether he was just making the best of a difficult hand.

Critics point to how FDR’s administration turned boat-loads of German Jews – like the St Louis –  away from America’s shores, and stymied attempts to have 20,000 Jewish children shipped from Europe to the US.

It’s always easier to try and portray national dysfunction as the problem of the leader alone, but FDR was a politician before he was an anti-semite, and like all good politicians, he was giving his voters what they wanted. According to THIS article:

“A Gallup poll from January 1939 asked if Americans would support bringing even 10,000 German refugee children into the country, public opinion ran 2:1 against.”

The article continues:

“The wife of the US’ immigration commissioner (who also happened to be a cousin of President Roosevelt) testified that “20,000 charming children would all too soon grow into 20,000 ugly adults.””[16]

If you take FDR in context, if you take a clear look at how the US built itself up on the back of black slavery and Indian genocide, and how white supremacists with guns and pseudo-science about ‘racial purity’ were always a defining characteristic of the country, FDR’s behavior becomes far more understandable:

He was reflecting the will of the people he governed.

 

Was FDR, personally, an anti-semite?

Probably, yes. In 2018 new documents[17] were revealed to the public from the FDR Library which revealed Roosevelt’s plans to “spread thing all over the world” the remnants of Europe’s Jews. ‘Project M’ was begun in 1942, when there was no longer any doubt about the mass murder of Jews going on in Europe. At that time, FDR asked his closest advisors to put together options for where to dump all the Jews who might still manage to survive the war – because he certainly didn’t want them crowding into America.

Roosevelt turned to one Aleš Hrdlička, the curator of physical anthropology at the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History and a rabid eugenicist and white supremacist in the best ‘pseudo-scientific’ Darwin style, to investigate the options.

In their correspondence, Roosevelt suggested:

“that while most South American countries would be glad to admit Jewish immigration, it was on the condition that the Jewish group were not localized in the cities, they want no ‘Jewish colonies,’ ‘Italian colonies,’ etc.”

When things didn’t progress with Hrdlička – who wanted the last say on the final contours of the project – Roosevelt next turned to Isaiah Bowman, then president of Johns Hopkins University. Bowman had fired a number of Jewish professors at Johns Hopkins, because:

“There are already too many Jews at Hopkins.”

On another occasion, Bowman opined that:

“Jews don’t come to Hopkins to make the world better or anything like that. They came for two things: to make money and to marry non-Jewish women.”

Bowman tried to ‘solve’ his own Jewish problem by placing quotas on Jewish students, particularly in the fields of maths and science. Roosevelt clearly felt he was just the man for the job, writing to him:

“Frankly, what I am rather looking for is the possibility of uninhabited or sparsely inhabited good agricultural lands to which Jewish colonies might be sent.” When he described the M Project to Winston Churchill, Roosevelt explained that it was looking at: “the problem of working out the best way to settle the Jewish question,” and that he believed the solution “essentially is to spread the Jews thin all over the world.”[18]

So FDR probably was an anti-semite and a white supremacist – but so were so many other ‘good Americans’ of that time.

For example, American Poet Ezra Pound was considered to be one of the most original writers and “master critics” of the 20th century in America:

the writer most responsible for making modernism in literature part of our lives.”[19]

That didn’t stop Pound from taking to the airwaves twice a week for Italian Fascist Radio, where he shared gems like these:

“That any Jew in the White House should send American kids to die for the private interests for the scum of the English earth… and the dregs of the Levantine [a term used to describe the Middle East].” – February, 26, 1942.

And this:

“Don’t start a pogrom – an old-style killing of small Jews. That system is no good whatever. Of course, if some man had a stroke of genius, and could start a pogrom up at the top, there might be something to say for it. But on the whole, legal measures are preferable.” – April 30th, 1942.

Which brings us to the core conclusions of this post.

There is so much more to say about ingrained American white supremacism, racism and anti-Semitism. There is so much more to say about a country which made its own ‘pursuit of happiness’ – and economic benefit – the main criteria for its actions both at home and abroad.

American white supremacism

But here are the takeaway points:

  • The United States of America was built on the creed of ‘white supremacy’ and ‘manifest destiny’. And it’s impossible to totally eradicate those ideas from the American psyche, especially as the brutal roots of modern America are still being largely whitewashed and romanticized.
  •  The United States has a very long history of preaching about human freedom, civil rights and equality – but its unpleasant actions have always belied it’s saintly-sounding rhetoric.
  • Hitler and the Nazis were inspired by America’s racial laws and ‘progress’ in the field of applying the Darwin-inspired, pseudo-scientific principles of eugenics in real time. Nazi lawyers studied American laws in great detail, to help them formulate the Nuremburg laws that would turn Jews into dehumanized second-class citizens.
  • FDR and ‘Middle America’ didn’t do more to stop the destruction of Europe’s Jews, and to let more Jews into America because they didn’t want to. Remember, barely two decades before President Calvin Coolidge wrote a piece where he stressed that America could only take in immigrants who were: “characterized by a capacity for assimilation.”
  • After the Nazis lost World War II, eugenics became discredited, and America (and the rest of the West…) rushed to ‘whitewash’ its historical attachment to ‘white supremacy’ and the American belief that God had given it permission to crush other ‘races’ to extinction. Post World War II, that sounded far too ‘Third Reich-y’, so American politicians like John Foster Dulles turned to the ‘Commie Threat’ to explain why America had to keep toppling democratically-elected governments all over the world that were trying to protest American control and exploitation of their natural resources.
  • ‘White supremacy’ in the United States is not an aberration, it’s woven into the very fabric of the country – and it’s not going away any time soon. All the people who are blaming Trump for ‘causing’ a surge in neo-nazi behavior, anti-Semitism and white supremacist activity in the US kind of have things backwards. Half the country (at least…) hold those beliefs, and they elected someone who they felt better represented them.

——————————————————

Do I think Trump is an anti-semite?

On balance, no I don’t. (But I could be wrong.) Trump is a business man who understands that America was ‘made great’ on the back of policies that put the white people in America first, at everyone else’s expense, and he’s trying to turn back the clock.

One thing I can tell you for sure: If it serves America’s economic interest to throw Israel under a bus, he will do it in a heartbeat – but it won’t be anything personal. Just money is the main motivation for people like Trump, and many others like him.

American white supremacism

What does all this mean for America’s Jews?

I’ll expand on that, God willing, in another post, but you can sum the situation up like this:

America is home to millions of ‘entitled’ white supremacists who generally dislike Jews, and who have free access to semi-automatic weapons.

And that’s not going to change anytime soon. The main reason anti-Semitism has stayed so minimal in the USA until recent times is because post World War II, the Nazis gave white supremacy a bad name. Also, the American economy was booming over the last 50 years, so fewer Americans felt aggrieved about ‘immigrants’ stealing their jobs and their wealth.

Things have changed now.

American debt is at catastrophic levels and even a good business man like Trump can’t really turn the tanker around and ‘make America great again’ because internationally, America is no longer in a position to impose its economic will on other countries via its army and covert ‘regime change’ (although it’s still trying…)

At most, Trump just bought America some time.

So now, this is the scenario unfolding in America:

On the one side, all the white supremacists with AR-15 semi-automatic rifles and a very long history of using guns and violence to try to solve their social and economic problems.

On the other side, a growing tide of ‘anti God’ and ‘anti-organized religion’ liberals who are trying to totally trash the family unit and any concept of traditional morality. There’s also a growing number of immigrants who want a piece of the American economic pie, some of whom are Muslim and some of whom (not necessarily the Muslims) are also anti-Semitic and / or anti-white.

And American Jews are in the middle of all this mess.

Historically, the trigger that causes the opposing forces in American society to clash violently is the economy. For as long as the money keeps flowing Stateside, they will be able to keep a lid on the white supremacists agitating that ‘immigrants’ have stolen their jobs. But if the economic situation starts to radically deteriorate – as it so easily could! – then it’s going to get very dangerous for Jews in America.

There are people on both sides of the divide that will try to use the Jews as the scapegoat for the problem.

The white supremacists will target the ‘liberal’ Jews in the US who they say control the media and the economy. And the ‘liberals’ and anti-semites in the other camp will target American support for Israel as being the main problem.

There’s more to say, there’s always more to say. But I wanted to set out something of a ‘potted history’ of white supremacy in the US so that more of the Jews living there understand what they are really dealing with, and that it’s not going away any time soon.

Poway and Pittsburgh could really only be the beginning of a culture clash that could leave American Jews reeling, whichever way it goes.

You don’t need an anti-Semitic president, or an anti-Semitic Congress or Senate, for violent anti-Semitism to become a huge problem in the US, lo alenu, God forbid. God doesn’t do the same thing twice, there will be no new ‘elected’ Hitler arriving on the scene.

There doesn’t need to be. There are already millions of white supremacists with guns in America.

And there is nothing anyone can do to disarm them, or make them go away.

American white supremacism

NOTES:

 

[1] https://www.britannica.com/topic/Declaration-of-Independence

[2] http://www.mrheintz.com/how-many-signers-of-the-declaration-of-independence-owned-slaves.html

[3] While it is difficult to determine exactly how many Natives lived in North America before Columbus,[6] estimates range from a low of 2.1 million[7] to 7 million[8] people to a high of 18 million.[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Population_history_of_indigenous_peoples_of_the_Americas

[4] https://historynewsnetwork.org/article/7302

[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1900_United_States_Census

[6] https://www.history.com/topics/westward-expansion/manifest-destiny

[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographic_history_of_the_United_States

[8] https://www.battlefields.org/learn/articles/civil-war-facts

[9] https://fusiontables.google.com/DataSource?dsrcid=225439#rows:id=1

[10] https://timesmachine.nytimes.com/timesmachine/1921/10/27/98760670.pdf

[11] http://hearth.library.cornell.edu/cgi/t/text/pageviewer-idx?c=hearth;rgn=full%20text;idno=6417403_1366_002;view=image;seq=15

[12] https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/grant-kkk/

 

[13] https://gizmodo.com/how-american-nazis-used-summer-camps-to-indoctrinate-th-1743267747

 

[14] Ibid.

[15] https://exhibitions.ushmm.org/americans-and-the-holocaust/main/us-fear-of-spies

[16] https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/1/27/14412082/refugees-history-holocaust

 

[17] http://www.fdrlibrary.marist.edu/_resources/images/psf/psfc0232.pdf

[18] https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/FDR-wanted-Jews-spread-thin-and-kept-out-of-US-documents-reveal-553336

 

[19] Page 31, ‘New York Jew’, by Alfred Kazin, published 1978

9 replies
  1. Elisheva
    Elisheva says:

    Very concerning. We keep on thinking (& hoping) that the West is a safe place to settle but the way things are shaping up it feels like we’re seriously mistaken.

    Reply
    • Rivka Levy
      Rivka Levy says:

      I don’t feel ‘happy’ that I’m sharing all this information about what’s really going on under all the pious hypocrisy in the West. Part of me really wishes things were different, but it seems God has a plan to get the Jews back to Israel, one way or another. But that doesn’t mean that it’s an easy process, or that everyone can get here. And that last part worries me tremendously. What can I do, except pray that God will help us all to make teshuva – there’s no hiding from the rockets or bullets. Wherever we happen to live, we all need to stick very close to God and His Torah.

      Reply
      • Rachel in NY
        Rachel in NY says:

        The more time that goes by, the less likely it is looking that I will be zoche to get my family out in time. I must take solace in the fact that in a “conversation” I had a few years ago with a very special autistic at the special needs camp my sons were working at, he typed on the computer in answer to my question that, no we don’t need to be in Eretz Yisroel to be saved, as long as we are performing Hashem’s will, we can and will be saved anywhere.

        Reply
        • Rivka Levy
          Rivka Levy says:

          The question boils down to how we know we are really ‘performing Hashem’s will’. That’s the whole question. Living in Israel is clearly a mitzvah, and like all mitzvahs, sometimes a lot of mesirut nefesh is required to actually do it.

          Reply
          • Rachel in NY
            Rachel in NY says:

            When I talk about “performing Hashem’s will,” I am referring to keeping Torah and mitzvos and not making excuses for not doing so. Sometimes all the mesirut nefesh in the world is not enough to get us to Eretz Yisroel. When, with all the hisbodedus and davening and mitzvos and what-not, still lead to the same answers of “No, you and your family are not zoche to leave,” then that is Hashem’s clear will. I am really getting very tired of the insinuation by those who were clearly blessed to do what I was not, insist that it is still a “choice.”

          • Rivka Levy
            Rivka Levy says:

            Rachel, we have a fundamental difference of approach that appears to be coming up on many levels. Giving how often I seem to be upsetting you with what I’m writing here, it could be this blog is not such a good fit for you. Re: free choice, this comes from here: https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/3909393/jewish/Free-Will.htm
            “The notion that human beings can exercise their own free will when making moral decisions is axiomatic to Judaism.”

            Rebbe Nachman sums up free choice as follows: “[A] person has in his ability to simply choose. If he wants to, he does something, if he doesn’t want to, he doesn’t do it.”

            Everyone has the choice of whether or not to move to Israel. That choice might involve having to leave loved ones behind, having to leave behind a stable parnassa, having to leave behind a comfort zone, a community, a way of life, a language you understand. For many of us, these things are so hard to accept / manage / deal with, we CHOOSE to stay in Chutz l’aretz. The ‘plus’ of being in Israel is simply not enough to outweigh the ‘minuses’ of leaving our families, homes, careers, communities, whatever it is.

            And that’s OK, CHOOSING to stay in Chul is a valid decision for many people. But it’s always a choice.

  2. Orna Nitzevet
    Orna Nitzevet says:

    Bs”d

    Shavuah tov lekulam ve rak b SHalom!
    Bezrat Hashem, if the curse of SHVAT YUD, THE TEN SHVATIM, is so strong, i pray and actually asked with written words, that President TRUMP do this job for the people ‘without’ choice, to not to give them choice but get them out of America.
    Every JEW born from Jewish mother or done Halchic conversion, suppose to be given just one choice by the WISE PRESIDENT OF THE COUNTRY THAT IS NOT THEIRS..
    To go back to ERETZ YISRAEL.
    So if it is happening in the near future, hopefully in dignity, i am the one that asked for, be mad at me for the case of being mad, so long my people are saved on time, i am ok with that.
    Its about these people that have JEWISH NESHAMA, CHELEK HASHEM, i want them to be here, safe home, its a chuzpa to see them out there, being killed for being JEWISH all appart, outside…
    i cannot see it anymore, the chutzpa of saying being strong, even if it means against the will of Hashem.
    But it might be, that these people are not chelek HASHEM, i do not know. Mashiah tzidkeinu is going to smell who is Jewish and who not.
    I have full trust in that. Just praying with all my power to get my brothers and sisters back, before they are going to be killed …again….so please Hashem, have mercy on them, have mercy ON YOURSELF AND TAKE WITH STRONG HAND ALL YOUR PIECES BACK! Its enough! I do not want to see goiym laugh about Jews that do not listen. Take them, bring them, and if they do not start to listen finally here, get tillim on them for the part, just do not let them outside, its too bad, when goiym laugh about OUR G’D, and give honour to Rebbe instead of Hashem Yitbarach!
    Now i hope that every Jewish man/women/child get this chance soon as possible from every place in the world…to come in dignity to ERETZ YISRAEL!
    Mashiah is a proces and we are deeply in, so lets role….one more step and one more step…od mead…od mead KOL AMO YISRAEL TZADIKIM, AVAL RAK B ERETZ YISRAEL!!!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.