Here’s two memos on immunizations and ‘killer’ over-reactions of the immune system that were published by the WHO, back in 1972.

They explain how ‘vaccines’ can be used to encourage the human body to basically ‘kill itself’.

This is big news – and I will walk you though what these memorandum are saying step-by-step, in plain English, and then we’ll compare and contrast with what medical doctors are seeing happening with the Covid 19 ‘vaccination’.

====

First things first, please go and download the memos – and circulate them to anyone who might be interested – HERE.

We all know that as soon as we trip over the real information that might start persuading others that we aren’t just ‘crazy conspiracy theories’, they disappear it.

So, the more people can get these memos and links around before that happens, the better.

====

Next, I’m going to bring something I just read on the habayitah blog HERE, quoting Dr Dolores Cahill, professor of molecular genetics at Dublin University’s medical school. Cahill is one of the people who has been publically trying to blow the whistle on the ‘vaccine’ for a few months already.

And HERE is the article on the principia-scientific.com website:

====

Here’s an excerpt, then I’ll plain English it for you:

What it [the Covid 19 ‘vaccine’] does is this gene therapy or medical device is setting up an autoimmune disease chronically.

It’s anaphylaxis in the first wave.

It’s anaphylaxis +allergic reaction the 2nd wave.

But the 3rd reaction occurs when you come across whatever the messenger RNA is against (virus), and now you have stimulated your immune system to have a low-grade autoimmune disease, not immunity to yourself per se because the mRNA is expressing a viral protein.

Now you’ve made yourself into a genetically modified organism, and so the immune system that is meant to push the viruses or bacteria out… now the autoimmune reaction is attacking your body low grade.

Now months later when you come across the virus that stimulates the immune system to get rid of the virus and when the immune system sees that you have viral proteins in your own cells and organs, then about a week later (the adaptive immune system kicks in, the mechanism that makes specific long-term memory antibodies against a pathogen) and you go into organ failure.

Because your immune system is killing your own organs.

Those patients will present as sepsis initially.

Then later you die of organ failure.

====

OK, here’s the plain English description of what she is saying:

1. After the first shot of the ‘vaccine’:

The immune system is effectively being broken down by the ‘vaccine’. A relatively small number of people will have a severe anaphylactic reaction, immediately as a result.

Many others will start to be way more susceptible to a serious reaction next time they come into contact with the coronavirus.

(This is is a good time to remind you that every cold, every flu, is basically a version of the coronavirus. This also explains why so many people apparently ‘came down’ with ‘Covid 19’ after getting the first shot. They were just way more susceptible to it, now their immune systems had been compromised by the mRNA in the ‘vaccine’.)

====

2. After the second shot of the ‘vaccine’:

The goal of the second jab is to put a small piece of ‘Covid 19 mRNA’ into every cell of the body.

Cahill says that short-term effects will be more anaphylactic reactions, and also more allergic reactions.

But that’s really not the real problem.

The real problem is what happens in stage 3.

====

3. The next time you come into contact with the coronavirus, after having 2 shots of ‘vaccine’:

Now, your body’s immune system has been ‘re-programmed’ to attack and destroy the ‘coronavirus’ in your body.

The problem is, the mRNA ‘vaccine’ has now coded the ‘coronavirus’ into every cell in your body.

So when your immune system tries to launch an ‘attack’ against the coronavirus, the next time you come into contact with it (and you will, because it’s the virus that causes the common cold and flu) – it’s going to start attacking every cell in your body.

And that could lead to sepsis, organ failure and death in a great number of people, lo alenu.

====

According to Cahill, it’s when we get to Stage 3:

Then the real adverse events will happen, against whatever is the real mRNA in the vaccines, and when the person vaccinated comes across (this coronavirus) sometime later …. what happened in the animal studies, 20% or 50% or 100% of the animals died.

====

You have to hand it to them: it’s evil genius.

This is how they can build in enough of a ‘delay’ between receiving the ‘vaccine’ and people dying in droves from coming into contact with the regular coronavirus, that anyone who isn’t ‘vaccinated’ should be able to easily shrug off, same as we all shrug off that winter cold every single year.

Then they’ll just claim it’s a ‘killer strain’, a ‘killer mutation’ of Covid 19 – and of course it is.

But it’s only killing people who had their cells reprogrammed to contain Covid 19 mRNA by the ‘vaccine’.

====

Now, how do we know that this is actually a ‘plan’, and not just a ‘conspiracy theory’?

Here’s where we go back 48 years, to two memos written by the World Health Organisation, entitled:

Virus-associated immunopathology: animal models and implications for human disease*

You can read part 1 of this memo for yourself, HERE, and part 2, HERE.

====

Here’s an excerpt of the Abstract for part 1:

Certain viruses, notably the leukaemia viruses and some of those causing persistent infections, depress the host’s ability to mount an antibody response to antigens, while other viruses may enhance the antibody response. Cell-mediated immunity may also be depressed.

====

Plain English:

This is saying that some viruses depress the body’s ability to produce antibodies, and weaken the immune system. While other viruses can cause the body’s immune system to go into overdrive.

====

Here’s an excerpt of the Abstract for part 2:

Part 2 of this memorandum describes further mechanisms whereby the interaction of a virus with the host’s immune system may lead to tissue damage. Cell-mediated immunity plays a vital role in promoting recovery from virus infections, but under some circumstances tissue damage may be caused by the reaction of immune cells with viral antigens.

====

Plain English:

This memo continues describing how viruses can interact with a person’s immune system to cause ’tissue damage’ – i.e. where the body’s internal organs start to break down.

It also explains that there are ‘some circumstances’ where this tissue damage / organ failure will be caused by the body’s immune cells reacting to ‘viral antigens’.

====

If you’re like me, you have no idea what a ‘viral antigen’ actually is, so you don’t really understand exactly what we’re being told here.

So next, let’s define what an ‘antigen’ is:

(Thank you, American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.)

antigen ăn′tĭ-jən

• n. A substance that when introduced into the body stimulates the production of an antibody. Antigens include toxins, bacteria, foreign blood cells, and the cells of transplanted organs.
• n. A substance that induces an immune response, usually foreign.
• n. any substance (as a toxin or enzyme) that stimulates an immune response in the body (especially the production of antibodies)

====

Remember this:

ANTIGEN = SOMETHING THAT STIMULATES THE PRODUCTION OF ANTIBODIES / AN IMMUNE REPONSE IN THE BODY.

Now, let’s try to find some of the ‘official propaganda’ explaining how these mRNA ‘vaccines’ are meant to work (shmirat eynayim friendly, and just over a minute long):

====

====

In a nutshell, these mRNA ‘vaccines’ work by telling the body’s cells to create the same ‘spike protein’ as Covid-19 / the coronavirus.

So, the next time that person comes into contact with the coronavirus, the body’s immune system will go into overdrive to ‘attack’ those spike proteins – and those spike proteins will be found in every cell of the body.

And then, if the animal trials are anything to go by, between 20-100% of the people who had their cells ‘changed’ to start producing Covid-19 ‘spike proteins’ will develop sepsis, organ failure, and then die.

God forbid.

====

Pay close attention to the weasel words being used, to describe the trials done with these vaccines.

This comes from the Forbes website, HERE:

(Emphasis mine).

====

We are all being told that these mRNA vaccines ‘stimulates the immune system’.

But they are being very careful to word things carefully, so that legally, they aren’t telling us that this ‘stimulated immune ‘system means that we will then be totally immune to Covid 19 / coronavirus in the future.

Because that’s not at all the case, as they themselves are telling us.

====

The following comes from the CDC’s own website, HERE:

[I]t’s possible a person could be infected with the virus that causes COVID-19 just before or just after vaccination and still get sick….

If your body develops an immune response—the goal of vaccination—there is a possibility you may test positive on some antibody tests…..

We won’t know how long immunity produced by vaccination lasts until we have more data on how well the vaccines work….

 mRNA vaccines teach our cells how to make a protein that triggers an immune response.

====

The amount of weasel words going on here is simply amazing.

The CDC is telling you that Covid-19 ‘vaccines’ won’t stop you from getting sick with Covid, and that the whole goal of the vaccination is to get your body to develop an immune response.

We are all sitting here assuming that’s a good thing.

But it’s that ‘extreme’ immune response that’s actually going to cause the body to start attacking itself next time you get a coronavirus- because every cell of the body has now been ‘taught’ to replicate the spike protein that identifies it as ‘Covid-19’ – leading to sepsis, organ failure and death.

For between 20-100% of the people who are participating in the this horrendous medical experiment, if the animal trials are anything to go by.

====

Remember the early stages of ‘Covid 19’, when so many people were being hospitalized with an unusual (and sometimes deadly) ‘cytokine storm’ reaction?

If you don’t, then this is a good refresher:

The immune system is there to help us fight infection, but sometimes it wreaks more havoc than the disease itself.

====

Remember, there was a link found between having the flu jab, and having a ‘serious reaction’ to Covid 19?

See THIS, to refresh your memory:

If they were trying out the chain reaction described above via the flu jab, before rolling it out as part of Covid-19, that would explain why some people suddenly developed these highly unusual and sometimes fatal ‘cytokine storms’ to Covid 19 (i.e. regular coronavirus with a fancy name) – while other people totally shrugged it off without even noticing.

====

Let’s get back to those memos from the WHO, written in 1972.

I’m just going to pull out some key quotes, first from memo #1, then from memo #2, then I’ll sum everything up in plain English, at the bottom of this post.

====

QUOTES FROM WHO MEMO #1:

“The properties of viruses are seemingly ideal for producing immunopathological damage.”

“Recent studies indicate that certain virus infections can affect the function of the immune system.”

“[Certain known] viruses usually depress the immune system, under certain circumstances to a significant extent (Dent, 1972). For example, the number of antibody-producing cells as determined by the haemolytic plaque test (Jeme) may reportedly be depressed by as much as 99 %.”

“The strongest evidence that antiviral antibody and complement can injure virus-infected cells has been produced by in vitro experiments. It has been shown that the infection of cells with viruses that do not produce cytologic injury (rabies (Wiktor et al., 1968), LCMV) (Oldstone & Dixon, 1971a), or with viruses that ultimately do cause cell damage (HSV, vacciniavirus, influenzavirus, Newcastle disease virus [NDV] (Brier et al., 1970) is followed by the appearance of new antigens on the surface of the infected cells and that the interaction of specific antiviral antibody and complement with these antigens can produce immunologic injury.

In the absence of either specific antiviral antibody or complement, such injury does not occur.”

“If… the density of virus-specific antigens on the cell surface should rise during the course of an infection, this would increase the likelihood of complement-mediated cell destruction.” 

====

Look at the bold stuff, in particular.

That last quote is telling us that if they can somehow ‘boost’ the amount of ‘virus-specific antigens’ = virus-specific antibodies that the cell is producing, then that greatly increases the chances of ‘immunologic injury’ – i.e., that the body will start to attack it’s own tissue and organs.

Getting each cell to create more ‘virus-specific antibodies’ is exactly what these mRNA ‘vaccines’ have been designed to do.

That’s not my opinion.

That’s what the official propaganda for these vaccines is telling us they are doing, inside the body.

====

Here’s some quotes from Memo #2:

“Viruses have long been suspected of contributing to the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. Antibodies directed against normal cell constituents [i.e. the immune system attacking regular, healthy cells in the body] have been reported in several virus infections.”

“The ability of a virus to cause autoimmune disease should be determined…”

“Immunization of very young hybrids with single stranded DNA can hasten the appearance of ANA and cause a fatal acceleration of the glomerulonephritis [i.e. severe kidney disease]. Synthetic double-stranded RNA without adjuvant provokes the formation of anti-RNA and/or anti-DNA complexes and, with adjuvant, exacerbates the kidney disease.”

====

Some interesting points to note about Memo #2, then we’ll sum everything up.

First, here’s the definition of ‘ANA’:

Antinuclear antibodies (ANA) are a group of autoantibodies produced by a person’s immune system when it fails to adequately distinguish between “self” and “nonself.”

So what that last par is saying, in plain English, is that when you ‘immunize’ a living being with ‘single stranded DNA’, that speeds up the process where the body’s immune system can no longer tell the difference between ‘enemy viruses’ and it’s own ‘healthy cells’

Do Pfizer’s and Moderna’s ‘vaccines’ contain single strand DNA?

YUP.

From HERE:

“The vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna also trigger the body’s cells to create a mock spike protein, but they do it differently: using mRNA wrapped in tiny bubbles of fat. Those tiny bubbles of fat and the single-strand mRNA are fragile.”

====

Next, we’re told that when that ANA reaction shows up, it causes a ‘fatal acceleration’ of kidney disease (‘glomerulonephritis’).

In plain English, that means tricking the body into fighting it’s own cells can cause fatal kidney disease = sepsis.

See HERE, for a simple explanation of how that actually works, and here’s a taster:

[S]epsis is the body’s often deadly response to infection.

Sepsis and septic shock can result from an infection anywhere in the body, such as pneumonia, influenza, or urinary tract infections. Worldwide, one-third of people who develop sepsis die.

Many who do survive are left with life-changing effects, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), chronic pain and fatigue, organ dysfunction, and/or amputations.

====

Now, I’m not a scientist, and I could have the medical terms referring to mRNA and DNA confused.

Given that this WHO memo was written 48 years ago, the terms could have ‘moved on’ significantly over five decades, and I’m very happy for someone with more knowledge to explain this in more detail.

But Dolores Cahill DOES have that knowledge, and what she says is going to happen to people with the Covid 19 ‘vaccines’ is clearly foreshadowed in these WHO memos, and the experiments and research they refer to.

====

Let’s sum all this up, as simply as we can.

Molecular geneticist Professor Dolores Cahill says that the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ will cause 3 main stages of destruction, with by far the highest number of deaths and serious reactions happening at stage 3.

These are:

Stage 1 (first vaccination):

Anaphylactic shock in a small number of people – the immune system gets ‘switched off’ / depressed.

Stage 2 (second vaccination):

Anaphylactic shock plus severe allergies in up to 10% of the people being ‘vaccinated’.

The ‘vaccine’ now tells each cell in the body to produce the ‘spike protein’ that will identify it as ‘Covid 19 / Coronavirus’.

Stage 3: Exposure to Covid 19 / Coronavirus again:

The body’s immune function is ‘switched back on’, and starts attacking the body’s healthy cells and tissue, which it has been tricked into mis-identifying as ‘Covid 19’.

This is the ‘ANA reaction’ / cytokine storm being described above.

This potentially leads to sepsis (severe kidney infection), organ failure and then death.

Between 20%-100% of the research animals died at this stage of the process, lo alenu.

All of the above processes were clearly set out in two WHO memos from 1972.

====

Let’s stop there.

This is big stuff to digest.

BH, it can still all be turned around – and don’t forget, Rav Natan wrote that even if someone already went to a doctor, Hashem can still save him.

But this appears to be what is going on with these vaccines, and how they are meant to work to ‘thin out’ the population.

TBC

====

UPDATE:

This explains much of the above, with more details about the ‘cytokine storm’, and the obliteration of the immune system, and the shocking results of the animal experiments in Hebrew.

Currently, there are no English subtitles, but if you have even basic Hebrew, you should be able to follow what he’s saying enough, in the meantime:

====

====

If you to to the links being referenced above, by Rav Yuval Asherov, you’ll find a lot more stuff in English.

Here is the report that Pfizer / BioNTech made to the FDA about their Covid 19 ‘vaccine’:

https://www.fda.gov/media/144245/download

Here’s a few snippets that are catching my eye:

8.4. Unknown Risks/Data Gaps

Safety in certain subpopulations

There are currently insufficient data to make conclusions about the safety of the vaccine in
subpopulations such as children less than 16 years of age, pregnant and lactating individuals, and immunocompromised individuals.

====

Yet, who have the ‘health’ organisations in Israel being pushing this vaccine on?

Immuncompromised old people, pregnant women and also children.

====

Continuing from 8.4 of the FDA doc:

Adverse reactions that are very uncommon or that require longer follow-up to be detected

Following authorization of the vaccine, use in large numbers of individuals may reveal
additional, potentially less frequent and/or more serious adverse events not detected in the trial
safety population of nearly 44,000 participants over the period of follow up at this time

====

What this bit of weasel wordery is telling us all is that because they kept the ‘follow up time’ super-short, when looking for ‘adverse reactions’, there is a very good chance that more serious ‘side effects’ will show up in people who were vaccinated, that Pfizer / BioNTech haven’t listed here.

But they will only know what they are over the longer term.

====

Also, remember this story where Israeli doctors were claiming they had ‘no idea’ that facial paralysis / Bells Palsy could result from the vaccination?

====

You’ll be shocked (shocked!) to discover they were lying through their teeth.

The Pfizer document flagged Bells Palsy as a known side effect from the trials:

Although the safety database revealed an imbalance of cases of Bell’s palsy (4 in the vaccine group and none in the placebo group), causal relationship is less certain because the number of cases was small and not more frequent than expected in the general population.

Further signal detection efforts for these adverse events will be informative with more widespread use of the vaccine.

====

That last sentence is basically saying: we’ll learn more about the damage the vaccine can do to people once we’ve conducted the medical experiment on a huge number of unsuspecting human beings.

====

And the last bit of 8.4 says this:

Vaccine-enhanced disease

Available data do not indicate a risk of vaccine-enhanced disease, and conversely suggest
effectiveness against severe disease within the available follow-up period. However, risk of
vaccine-enhanced disease over time, potentially associated with waning immunity, remains unknown and needs to be evaluated further.

====

This last bit of weasel wordery is saying that in the very short term we allowed to monitor test subjects for ‘vaccine-enhanced disease’, we didn’t find anything.

But, who knows what’s going to happen over the longer term.

(Maybe, they should read the memos from the WHO, to give them an idea?)

====

Also, take a look at 8.2, “Unknown Benefits/Data Gaps”

Here’s a an exercpt:

As the interim and final analyses have a limited length of follow-up, it is not possible to assess
sustained efficacy over a period longer than 2 months.

Effectiveness in individuals previously infected with SARS-CoV-2

[A]vailable data are insufficient to make conclusions about benefit in individuals with prior SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Effectiveness in pediatric populations [i.e. children]

The representation of pediatric participants in the study population is too limited to adequately
evaluate efficacy in pediatric age groups younger than 16 years.

Future vaccine effectiveness as influenced by characteristics of the pandemic, changes in the virus, and/or potential effects of co-infections

The evolution of the pandemic characteristics, such as increased attack rates, increased exposure of subpopulations, as well as potential changes in the virus infectivity, antigenically significant mutations to the S protein, and/or the effect of coinfections may potentially limit the generalizability of the efficacy conclusions over time.

Vaccine effectiveness against asymptomatic infection

Data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against asymptomatic infection…

 Vaccine effectiveness against long-term effects of COVID-19 disease

Additional evaluations will be needed to assess the effect of the vaccine in preventing long-term
effects of COVID-19, including data from clinical trials and from the vaccine’s use postauthorization.

Vaccine effectiveness against mortality

A larger number of individuals at high risk of COVID-19 and higher attack rates would be needed to confirm efficacy of the vaccine against mortality.

Vaccine effectiveness against transmission of SARS-CoV-2

Data are limited to assess the effect of the vaccine against transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from
individuals who are infected despite vaccination.

====

You got that?

On the basis of this document, and others like it, Israel’s Health Ministry and Prime Minister have pushed the vaccination on 3 million people already, including immunocompromised old people, pregnant women and even children.

And yet Pfizer itself is saying it has no idea what the ‘adverse reactions’ are over the long term (defined as more than 3 months – the trials took place between July 27 – November 14, 2020), nor how serious those ‘adverse reactions’ could be.

And on top of that, this ‘vaccine’ doesn’t provide protection against dying from Covid 19, or transmitting Covid 19 to other people, not does it ‘mitigate’ the long-term effects of Covid 19 on the body.

====

Don’t just take my word for it.

Please, all the lawyers and medical people out there, go and read this for yourself, and tell the rest of us in plain English what you discover.

====

Another research document that Rabbi Asherov references is this one:

Antibody-dependent enhancement and SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and therapies

Here’s a taster:

One potential hurdle for antibody-based vaccines and therapeutics is the risk of exacerbating COVID-19 severity via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE).

ADE can increase the severity of multiple viral infections, including other respiratory viruses such as respiratory syncytial virus (RSV)^9,10 and measles^11,12.

ADE in respiratory infections is included in a broader category named enhanced respiratory disease (ERD), which also includes non-antibody-based mechanisms such as cytokine cascades and cell-mediated immunopathology.

====

Plain English:

‘Vaccines’ that are designed to encourage the body to develop its own antibodies to Covid 19 – like Pfizer and Moderna’s ‘mRNA’ vaccines – run the risk that the next time the person gets Covid 19, it could be way more severe than otherwise.

Some of the problems these vaccines could set off include cytokine storms (or ‘cascades) and causing the body’s immune system to start attacking healthy cells, tissue and organs (aka, ‘cell-mediated immunopathology’).

Exactly as we described above, in the words of the molecular geneticist, Professor Dolores Cahill.

====

You really still just want to tell me that I’m just a ‘conspiracy theorist’?

Really?

Hashem yishmor.

====

UPDATE #2:

If you go HERE, you can read the FDA document explaining why they decided to wave through ‘Covid 19 vaccines’ as an ’emergency measure’, that didn’t require the usual oversight and clinical trials to check they weren’t killing off half the world’s population by mistake.

Haha.

Here’s what it says on page 6, about why the FDA decided to give ’emergency approval’:

====

Points 2, 3 and 4, above, are just not true.

There is no data from ‘adequate and well-controlled trials’; the ‘known and potential benefits of the product’ don’t ‘outweigh the known and potential risks of the product’; and there was – and still is – an ‘adequate, approved and available alternative to the product for diagnosing, preventing, or treating the disease or condition.’

It’s called hydroxychloroquine, and Dr Zelenko told us all about it right at the beginning of the Covid 19 ‘outbreak’, and you can read more about it HERE.

(In the comments section of that blog, I also found this:)

After 440,000 Americans are Dead – Facebook and American Journal of Medicine Admit Their Stand on HCQ was Wrong — These People Should be Prosecuted!

====

Again, go read through the 53 pages of the FDA document provided by Pfizer and BioNTech about Covid-19, and please – PLEASE! – show me where that information is hiding out.

I read through it, and all I can see is lots of weasel words like ‘possibly’, ‘should’, ‘could’, ‘is expected to’, etc.

That isn’t hard facts.

That isn’t solid evidence.

That’s conjecture and guesses, dressed up in scientific language.

And they admit again and again and again, that they just don’t have the data, or the time scale, to really know what the real benefits are (assuming they even exist…), nor, what the real risks are.

If I missed it, please do let me know.

And if I didn’t miss it – then why did the FDA give this ’emergency approval’ based on such a patently falsified basis?

====

You might also like this article: